# Unveiling the Mind Games Interviewers Use in Job Interviews
Written on
Understanding Interview Tactics
As an HR professional with over fifteen years of experience, I've employed various strategies to evaluate potential hires. I often utilize subtle probing techniques that incorporate psychological methods to gain deeper insights into a candidate's personality and work ethic. Below, I will share some of the tactics that take place during interviews, providing a glimpse into my thought process.
Interviewers often rely on a range of strategies to sift through candidates and find the most suitable ones. Frequently, mind games are employed to elicit insights into an applicant's character or approach to work. It’s beneficial for candidates to understand these methods so they can prepare accordingly.
Creating Awkward Silences
At times, I deliberately pause conversations, allowing an uncomfortable silence to settle. This isn't meant to unsettle you; rather, it’s a tactic to observe your reactions. In such situations, many individuals tend to drop their guard, offering candid glimpses into their thoughts.
Recruiters may pause during interviews, creating an atmosphere filled with silence. The goal is to encourage candidates to fill the void with their words, often leading them to share unprepared thoughts that reveal much about their mindset.
Pointed Questions About Previous Supervisors
I might ask you specific questions regarding your past managers to instill the notion that I could be contacting them for verification. The thought of a potential employer reaching out to a former boss often compels candidates to be more truthful.
For example, I might ask you to spell your boss’s name or inquire about their work schedule. These queries are designed to make you consider the possibility that I might fact-check your statements with your previous employer, thus prompting you to respond with greater honesty.
Partial Questions to Gauge Problem-Solving Skills
I may present a scenario from a past workplace experience while intentionally omitting the resolution. My intention is to assess whether you are naturally inclined to seek solutions. Candidates who excel at problem-solving often find it difficult to discuss an issue without suggesting ways to address it.
An interviewer could ask you to describe a challenging situation you've faced but might stop short of inquiring about how you resolved it. This approach is to determine if you are someone who instinctively seeks solutions, as effective problem-solvers typically don’t dwell on problems without proposing potential remedies.
Analyzing Pronoun Usage
The pronouns you choose during our conversation can reveal significant insights about your work perspective. Research indicates that top candidates frequently use first-person pronouns, highlighting their proactive contributions, while those who lean on second or third-person pronouns may indicate a more passive approach.
Studies show that high achievers tend to use first-person pronouns about 50% more than lower performers. If your dialogue is filled with "I" and "me" rather than "you," "he," or "they," it might suggest that you are a driven individual.
Assessing Adverb Usage
In my experience, high performers convey confidence in their statements without relying on excessive adverbs. When candidates avoid terms like “very” or “highly,” it often indicates their trust in the information they provide.
Interviewers recognize that confident candidates don’t feel the need to embellish their statements with qualifying adverbs. A lack of such adverbs in your responses may signal to the interviewer that you are indeed a high performer.
Observing Tense Usage
Research and my observations suggest that top performers often recount their experiences in the past tense, reflecting genuine past achievements. In contrast, those less experienced may gravitate toward present or future tenses, as they might rely on hypothetical scenarios.
Psychological studies show that successful candidates predominantly use the past tense, whereas less confident individuals tend to lean more on present or future tenses. This tendency is often due to high performers having real experiences to draw from, while less experienced candidates may feel the need to envision scenarios.
Identifying Overuse of Absolutes
I have noticed that some candidates frequently use absolutes like "never" or "always," which often correlates with lower performance levels. Such language can inadvertently signal insecurity or a need to overcompensate.
Understanding these nuances is essential for both candidates and interviewers. If you find yourself frequently using absolutes or specific tenses, it may be time to reassess and adjust your communication style. Remember, the key lies in growth and development.
Interviewers are aware that terms such as "never" or "always" are often the hallmark of lower performers. Research indicates that low achievers use absolutes twice as often as their high-performing counterparts. A reliance on such language can indicate insecurity and a lack of confidence, whereas those who excel typically do not need to rely on absolutes to strengthen their statements.
Be mindful of these tendencies; if you notice that you lean heavily on absolutes, the present tense, or qualifying adverbs, it’s something that interviewers will likely notice. Focus on developing new habits to enhance your communication skills.
Best of luck with your interview!
Chapter 2: The Psychological Tactics in Interviewing
In this insightful video, discover the four brain teasers that interviewers often ask to evaluate candidates. These challenges can provide a glimpse into your problem-solving abilities and critical thinking skills.
This video discusses whether interviewers are genuinely rude or simply testing your reactions. Understanding this dynamic can help you navigate the interview process more effectively.