Lessons from Vietnam's Rat Removal Initiative: A Cautionary Tale
Written on
Understanding Incentives
Every individual is influenced by incentives in various forms. For instance, some children receive $10 for mowing their parents' lawn, while others might find themselves mowing under the threat of consequences. This concept of incentives is central to understanding a remarkable case from early 20th-century Vietnam, which highlights the significance of crafting motivation—both for oneself and others.
The Initial Challenges
In 1897, Paul Doumer arrived in Vietnam with the ambition of revitalizing his career after a lackluster tenure as France's Finance Minister. His primary objective was straightforward: to enhance the profitability of Vietnam, a French colony at the time. Initially, Doumer found success with taxation and export initiatives while aiming to modernize Hanoi to attract tourism and showcase the colony's achievements.
One of Doumer's key projects involved establishing effective sewage systems, which were crucial for tourism and the city's reputation. Millions were invested in constructing 10 miles of sewer lines, marking a promising beginning. However, this infrastructure inadvertently created a haven for rats, leading to an alarming increase in their population as they thrived in the waste-filled environment.
The Rodent Overpopulation Crisis
Rats reproduce rapidly, reaching maturity in just one month, with females capable of birthing 10-12 offspring multiple times a year. The situation escalated quickly, resulting in a significant rat infestation that posed health risks, including the spread of the bubonic plague—historically linked to rats in Europe.
The negative publicity surrounding this rat problem reached the French government, tarnishing their efforts to modernize Vietnam and turning their image into a farce. The sewage system, intended to combat disease, instead became a breeding ground for it.
The Search for Solutions
Faced with a burgeoning rat population, Doumer initially resorted to employing “rat hunters” equipped with torches to navigate the dark, cramped sewers.
Despite their efforts, these hunters encountered formidable challenges as the rats proved elusive and adept at escaping. At their height, the teams managed to kill thousands of rats daily, yet the infestation persisted.
Recognizing the inadequacy of this approach, Doumer introduced a new strategy aimed at crowdsourcing the solution. Citizens could earn a penny for each rat tail they brought in, a policy intended to both incentivize participation and provide financial support to locals.
The Policy's Unintended Consequences
While the influx of rat tails initially suggested progress, it soon became apparent that the policy had unintended repercussions. People began to recognize that preserving the source of their income—rats—was more beneficial than eradicating them. Consequently, rat farms emerged, where individuals bred rats to profit from the tail bounty.
This realization marked the policy's failure, leading to a reluctant acceptance of cohabitation with the rats, which ultimately triggered several disease outbreaks. This phenomenon is often referred to as The Cobra Effect, where attempts to solve a problem inadvertently exacerbate it.
Key Takeaways
The Hanoi rat removal initiative serves as a powerful reminder of three essential lessons:
- The potential for unintended consequences when incentive structures are misaligned.
- The complexity of formulating effective public policies.
- The surprising resilience and adaptability of pests like rats.
In light of these insights, it’s wise to address pest issues promptly before they escalate.
For more intriguing stories and lessons, subscribe to Relax and Read.